Criminal Identification Procedures in the Twenty-First Century Essay

Criminal Identification Procedures in the Twenty-First Century - turn out ExampleHowever, because these advances are still so new it is not always possible to understand their full implication. Do they have unintended consequences? Are they genuinely as useful as they appear? And perhaps more importantly will we become so reliant on this technology that we throw forth good old sleuthing techniques and human controls and simply let technology result over? These are all incredibly important questions that we must weigh carefully about. This essay will examine some of these questions by looking at the pros and cons of specific technological advances.In the criminal justice system at that place are two opposing modes of looking of how to deal with criminals. The first is the due process model. The gist of this model is that an individual can never be disadvantaged of basic human rights no matter how horrible a crime he or she has committed. Even to put someone in prison is to take away the criminals inalienable right to liberty and there must be many appeals and a thoroughly scrutinized process to ensure that e trulything is do by the book. At its heart the due process model would rather see nine guilty people on the street than one unprejudiced person in prison. The end result of this mode requires many hours of painstaking work by humans checking and rechecking evidence and the court case moving very slowly through the system. The second mode of looking at criminal justice is the Criminal Control Mode. This system puts a high value on locking up guilty people. It focuses on protecting citizens from criminals as quickly as possible. Under this system more money is spent on policing and deterring and prosecuting criminals as quickly as possible so that the police and prosecutors can move on quickly to the next batch. If an innocent person is caught in the net, that is a tragedy, moreover what is important is that many bad guys got caught too.